User Tools

Site Tools


opening_statements

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Last revision Both sides next revision
opening_statements [2019/04/12 14:34]
frescom
opening_statements [2019/04/12 14:36]
frescom
Line 12: Line 12:
   - Comment or No Comment: "On my advice my client will/will not be answering questions. Please do not undermine my clients decision or I will intervene."​   - Comment or No Comment: "On my advice my client will/will not be answering questions. Please do not undermine my clients decision or I will intervene."​
   - Reasons to intervene:   - Reasons to intervene:
-  ​- the client asks for advice +    * - the client asks for advice 
-  - introduction of new undisclosed evidence +    ​* ​- introduction of new undisclosed evidence 
-  - any pressure put upon the client +    ​* ​- any pressure put upon the client 
-  - a break is necessary +    ​* ​- a break is necessary 
-Summarise the disclosure +  ​- ​Summarise the disclosure 
-Request more information:​ +  ​- ​Request more information:​ 
-Ask for the purpose of the interview +    * - Ask for the purpose of the interview 
-Ask for undisclosed evidence +    * - Ask for undisclosed evidence 
-Whether there is sufficient evidence to charge +    * - Whether there is sufficient evidence to charge 
-Intentions post-interview+    * - Intentions post-interview 
 My opinion is just that: an opinion. Far be it for me to disagree with the real experts but I have several issues with the use of an Opening Statement. Firstly, I simply cannot see the point. Interviewing Officers know full well what the solicitor or there for. They understand his role. I cannot see a reason for spelling it out. If I intervene in an interview I do so when and if it is necessary. ​ My opinion is just that: an opinion. Far be it for me to disagree with the real experts but I have several issues with the use of an Opening Statement. Firstly, I simply cannot see the point. Interviewing Officers know full well what the solicitor or there for. They understand his role. I cannot see a reason for spelling it out. If I intervene in an interview I do so when and if it is necessary. ​
  
opening_statements.txt · Last modified: 2019/04/12 14:37 by frescom