This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
Both sides previous revision Previous revision | Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
opening_statements [2019/04/12 14:34] frescom |
opening_statements [2019/04/12 14:36] frescom |
||
---|---|---|---|
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
- Comment or No Comment: "On my advice my client will/will not be answering questions. Please do not undermine my clients decision or I will intervene." | - Comment or No Comment: "On my advice my client will/will not be answering questions. Please do not undermine my clients decision or I will intervene." | ||
- Reasons to intervene: | - Reasons to intervene: | ||
- | - the client asks for advice | + | * - the client asks for advice |
- | - introduction of new undisclosed evidence | + | * - introduction of new undisclosed evidence |
- | - any pressure put upon the client | + | * - any pressure put upon the client |
- | - a break is necessary | + | * - a break is necessary |
- | Summarise the disclosure | + | - Summarise the disclosure |
- | Request more information: | + | - Request more information: |
- | Ask for the purpose of the interview | + | * - Ask for the purpose of the interview |
- | Ask for undisclosed evidence | + | * - Ask for undisclosed evidence |
- | Whether there is sufficient evidence to charge | + | * - Whether there is sufficient evidence to charge |
- | Intentions post-interview | + | * - Intentions post-interview |
My opinion is just that: an opinion. Far be it for me to disagree with the real experts but I have several issues with the use of an Opening Statement. Firstly, I simply cannot see the point. Interviewing Officers know full well what the solicitor or there for. They understand his role. I cannot see a reason for spelling it out. If I intervene in an interview I do so when and if it is necessary. | My opinion is just that: an opinion. Far be it for me to disagree with the real experts but I have several issues with the use of an Opening Statement. Firstly, I simply cannot see the point. Interviewing Officers know full well what the solicitor or there for. They understand his role. I cannot see a reason for spelling it out. If I intervene in an interview I do so when and if it is necessary. | ||