User Tools
identification
Differences
This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.
| Next revision | Previous revision Last revision Both sides next revision | ||
|
identification [2017/04/30 23:17] frescom created |
identification [2017/04/30 23:23] frescom |
||
|---|---|---|---|
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| ====== IDENTIFICATION ====== | ====== IDENTIFICATION ====== | ||
| - | 1. Introduction | + | The basic rules for the evidential requirements for recording identification of a suspect in a witness statement is summarised in the acronym ADVOKATE from Turnbull 1977 |
| - | This introduction provides an overview of the contents of this section. | + | |
| + | **A**mount of time | ||
| + | **D**istance | ||
| + | **V**isibility | ||
| + | **O**bstructions | ||
| + | **K**nown or seen before | ||
| + | **A**ny reason to remember | ||
| + | **T**imelapse between first and subsequent description | ||
| + | **Errors between 1st description and actual appearance | ||
| + | |||
| + | 1. Introduction\\ | ||
| Where a suspect disputes identification, the prosecution will be put to proof that the defendant is, beyond all reasonable doubt, the person who committed the offence. | Where a suspect disputes identification, the prosecution will be put to proof that the defendant is, beyond all reasonable doubt, the person who committed the offence. | ||
identification.txt · Last modified: 2017/04/30 23:44 by frescom
Page Tools
