User Tools

Site Tools


criminal_bills_assessment_manual

Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
criminal_bills_assessment_manual [2018/04/01 18:57]
frescom
criminal_bills_assessment_manual [2018/04/01 19:02]
frescom
Line 906: Line 906:
 letter containing an expert’s report, then the actual time spent considering the letter may be charged as letter containing an expert’s report, then the actual time spent considering the letter may be charged as
 preparation,​ provided that it is reasonable. preparation,​ provided that it is reasonable.
 +
 11. Where a letter is produced to a standard format then the presumption would be that the routine 11. Where a letter is produced to a standard format then the presumption would be that the routine
 letter rate should be claimed for that letter. Where a routine letter is adapted to include content that is letter rate should be claimed for that letter. Where a routine letter is adapted to include content that is
 particular to the client’s case and materially progresses the case, the time involved in drafting that part of particular to the client’s case and materially progresses the case, the time involved in drafting that part of
 the letter may be allowed as preparation,​ provided that it exceeds the time threshold set out above. the letter may be allowed as preparation,​ provided that it exceeds the time threshold set out above.
 +
 12. Letters are subject to the reasonableness test in the usual way and where a number of separate 12. Letters are subject to the reasonableness test in the usual way and where a number of separate
 letters are produced to deal with matters which could reasonably, conveniently and appropriately have letters are produced to deal with matters which could reasonably, conveniently and appropriately have
Line 919: Line 921:
 may be allowed in circumstances where it is reasonable and necessary to send separate letters (e.g. a may be allowed in circumstances where it is reasonable and necessary to send separate letters (e.g. a
 case involving a child where copy letters are sent to the child’s parent or guardian). case involving a child where copy letters are sent to the child’s parent or guardian).
 +
 13. The solicitor may, if they consider it appropriate,​ write to the client after each court appearance, 13. The solicitor may, if they consider it appropriate,​ write to the client after each court appearance,
 giving details of the decision of the court and the client'​s next appearance before the court. The solicitor giving details of the decision of the court and the client'​s next appearance before the court. The solicitor
Line 926: Line 929:
 case. Reference should be made to the PoP CRIMLA 2 see: case. Reference should be made to the PoP CRIMLA 2 see:
 https://​www.gov.uk/​guidance/​legal-aid-points-of-principle-of-general-importance-pop https://​www.gov.uk/​guidance/​legal-aid-points-of-principle-of-general-importance-pop
 +
 14. It will not usually be reasonable to allow a claim for a letter written by a secretary or other nonfee-earner 14. It will not usually be reasonable to allow a claim for a letter written by a secretary or other nonfee-earner
 without any specific action by the fee-earner, unless it can be construed as fee-earner work without any specific action by the fee-earner, unless it can be construed as fee-earner work
Line 931: Line 935:
 example of a letter that would not require fee-earner work would be the sending of a cheque to an example of a letter that would not require fee-earner work would be the sending of a cheque to an
 expert. expert.
 +
 15. It is good practice to provide covering letters when sending out documents. Sending the 15. It is good practice to provide covering letters when sending out documents. Sending the
 document alone may be insufficient explanation to the recipient and retaining only the document on file is document alone may be insufficient explanation to the recipient and retaining only the document on file is
Line 936: Line 941:
 Telephone Calls Telephone Calls
 Criminal Bills Assessment Manual – Version 4– July 2017 21 Criminal Bills Assessment Manual – Version 4– July 2017 21
 +
 16. If a telephone call is claimed as non-routine attendance, and at preparation rates, a proper record 16. If a telephone call is claimed as non-routine attendance, and at preparation rates, a proper record
 of its content should be provided to justify this claim. The Assessor should consider whether the call was of its content should be provided to justify this claim. The Assessor should consider whether the call was
Line 941: Line 947:
 call satisfying these criteria and lasting over 12 minutes in length would be likely to justify a claim for call satisfying these criteria and lasting over 12 minutes in length would be likely to justify a claim for
 preparation. Any call claimed as preparation must not be simultaneously claimed as a routine item. preparation. Any call claimed as preparation must not be simultaneously claimed as a routine item.
 +
 17. The Assessor should look at the work done rather than the role of the person conducting it. 17. The Assessor should look at the work done rather than the role of the person conducting it.
 Chargeable, fee-earning,​ work is work for which it is appropriate to make a direct charge to a client. Chargeable, fee-earning,​ work is work for which it is appropriate to make a direct charge to a client.
Line 946: Line 953:
 overheads. Administrative telephone calls are generally calls to arrange appointments or other calls that overheads. Administrative telephone calls are generally calls to arrange appointments or other calls that
 have no legal content. have no legal content.
 +
 18. No allowance can be made for non-effective or abortive telephone calls i.e. where the line was 18. No allowance can be made for non-effective or abortive telephone calls i.e. where the line was
 engaged or the telephone is not answered or a mobile phone is switched off. R -v- Hudson - The Taxing engaged or the telephone is not answered or a mobile phone is switched off. R -v- Hudson - The Taxing
Line 1023: Line 1031:
 each journey. Reference should be made to the PoP CRIMLA 33 see: each journey. Reference should be made to the PoP CRIMLA 33 see:
 https://​www.gov.uk/​guidance/​legal-aid-points-of-principle-of-general-importance-pop https://​www.gov.uk/​guidance/​legal-aid-points-of-principle-of-general-importance-pop
 +
 12. Local travel expenses should not be claimed if the solicitor’s office is within walking distance of 12. Local travel expenses should not be claimed if the solicitor’s office is within walking distance of
 the court. A solicitor is not entitled to claim the cost of travelling from home to the office. R- v- Slessor – the court. A solicitor is not entitled to claim the cost of travelling from home to the office. R- v- Slessor –
Line 1029: Line 1038:
 from his home; the journey should be deemed to start from the solicitor'​s office, unless he in fact started from his home; the journey should be deemed to start from the solicitor'​s office, unless he in fact started
 from his home and that was nearer to the court than his office;” from his home and that was nearer to the court than his office;”
 +
 13. Providers are not entitled to claim the time or costs for travelling between the Provider’s offices 13. Providers are not entitled to claim the time or costs for travelling between the Provider’s offices
 unless justified for example if the witness or client requested a meeting nearer to them due to mobility unless justified for example if the witness or client requested a meeting nearer to them due to mobility
 problems. The maximum fee principle will be applied to any claim where staff have travelled from a nonlocal problems. The maximum fee principle will be applied to any claim where staff have travelled from a nonlocal
 office or where non-employed fee earner have been used, such as an agent or representative. office or where non-employed fee earner have been used, such as an agent or representative.
 +
 14. It would generally be expected for the client to attend the solicitor’s office. A solicitor’s claim for 14. It would generally be expected for the client to attend the solicitor’s office. A solicitor’s claim for
 travelling to attend the client may be allowed only where there is a particular reason for do so and a travelling to attend the client may be allowed only where there is a particular reason for do so and a
Line 1040: Line 1051:
 telephone. Where it is deemed that an unnecessary number of journeys are made then the travel telephone. Where it is deemed that an unnecessary number of journeys are made then the travel
 claimed may be disallowed. claimed may be disallowed.
 +
 15. 9.102, of the SCC Specification confirms that the Provider must not claim more than 45 minutes 15. 9.102, of the SCC Specification confirms that the Provider must not claim more than 45 minutes
 travel time each way on a Police Station exceptional claim. travel time each way on a Police Station exceptional claim.
 +
 16. Furthermore 12.35 of the SCC Specification confirms that the Provider must not claim more than 16. Furthermore 12.35 of the SCC Specification confirms that the Provider must not claim more than
 one hour each way on a Prison Law Escape Fee Case. The only exception to this is when a client is one hour each way on a Prison Law Escape Fee Case. The only exception to this is when a client is
 moved Prison and the case has already reached the Escape Fee Threshold. In these circumstances a moved Prison and the case has already reached the Escape Fee Threshold. In these circumstances a
 Provider may claim up to three hours travel either way (12.36-12.37 of the SCC Specification). Provider may claim up to three hours travel either way (12.36-12.37 of the SCC Specification).
 +
 17. Assessors should note that on occasions a fee-earner may have to travel with bulky case papers 17. Assessors should note that on occasions a fee-earner may have to travel with bulky case papers
 and reference books. There is also a security and confidentiality issue in that solicitors must keep the and reference books. There is also a security and confidentiality issue in that solicitors must keep the
Line 1051: Line 1065:
 circumstances it may not be reasonable to expect a solicitor to use public transport. The onus is on the circumstances it may not be reasonable to expect a solicitor to use public transport. The onus is on the
 solicitor to provide relevant justification on file. solicitor to provide relevant justification on file.
 +
 18. The mileage rate outlined at Part 5.48, of the SCC Specification should only be paid where the 18. The mileage rate outlined at Part 5.48, of the SCC Specification should only be paid where the
 use of a private motor vehicle was necessary (for example, because no public transport was available), use of a private motor vehicle was necessary (for example, because no public transport was available),
Line 1057: Line 1072:
 the use of a private motor vehicle was otherwise reasonable (for example, where a fee earner needs to the use of a private motor vehicle was otherwise reasonable (for example, where a fee earner needs to
 carry a large number of sensitive documents). carry a large number of sensitive documents).
 +
 19. The Mileage rate for the use of a bicycle is 20p per mile. 19. The Mileage rate for the use of a bicycle is 20p per mile.
 +
 20. In instances where there is no justification for the use of a private motor vehicle, the cost of public 20. In instances where there is no justification for the use of a private motor vehicle, the cost of public
 transportation,​ or a notional public transport mileage rate (25p) may be applied. The public transport rate  transportation,​ or a notional public transport mileage rate (25p) may be applied. The public transport rate 
Line 1079: Line 1096:
 cases in which it is appropriate to include an element for expenses in the fees allowed, but no allowance cases in which it is appropriate to include an element for expenses in the fees allowed, but no allowance
 for the cost of time spent in travelling is made to them.” for the cost of time spent in travelling is made to them.”
 +
 21. The Assessor should allow what is reasonable in the circumstances,​ bearing in mind that the 21. The Assessor should allow what is reasonable in the circumstances,​ bearing in mind that the
 most economical fare might not always be appropriate. It would be usual to expect alternative quotes to most economical fare might not always be appropriate. It would be usual to expect alternative quotes to
 be sought to identify the most competitive route. be sought to identify the most competitive route.
 +
 22. Invoices/​receipts should always be produced in support of claims for travel expenses. Where 22. Invoices/​receipts should always be produced in support of claims for travel expenses. Where
 travel disbursements are claimed, a dated breakdown must be provided in support. Claims for up to £20 travel disbursements are claimed, a dated breakdown must be provided in support. Claims for up to £20
Line 1087: Line 1106:
 on file. All expenses of £20 or more (excluding mileage) must be substantiated by the relevant on file. All expenses of £20 or more (excluding mileage) must be substantiated by the relevant
 disbursement voucher or an explanation why it is not available on the file. disbursement voucher or an explanation why it is not available on the file.
 +
 23. If prior authority has been obtained to cover the expense, then the voucher and a copy of the 23. If prior authority has been obtained to cover the expense, then the voucher and a copy of the
 authority must be available but there is no need to justify why the expense was incurred, unless the authority must be available but there is no need to justify why the expense was incurred, unless the
 amount exceeds the prior authority given. amount exceeds the prior authority given.
 +
 24. The ticket and/or an internet print out for the journey undertaken should be provided alongside 24. The ticket and/or an internet print out for the journey undertaken should be provided alongside
 the evidence that the fee for the journey has been paid. The onus is on the Provider to ensure that clear the evidence that the fee for the journey has been paid. The onus is on the Provider to ensure that clear
Line 1270: Line 1291:
 9. Once the ICA has made a decision there is no further right of appeal. ​ 9. Once the ICA has made a decision there is no further right of appeal. ​
 Criminal Bills Assessment Manual – Version 4– July 2017 30 Criminal Bills Assessment Manual – Version 4– July 2017 30
 +
 5. Police Station and Criminal Investigations Work 5. Police Station and Criminal Investigations Work
 +
 5.1 Regulations 5.1 Regulations
 +
 1. Police Station Advice and Assistance is provided under Part 2 of the Criminal Legal Aid (General) 1. Police Station Advice and Assistance is provided under Part 2 of the Criminal Legal Aid (General)
 Regulations 2013. This should be read alongside Section 13 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and Regulations 2013. This should be read alongside Section 13 of the Legal Aid, Sentencing and
 Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, which determines the Director of Legal Aid Casework, in the context Punishment of Offenders Act 2012, which determines the Director of Legal Aid Casework, in the context
 of police station work, to fund such Advice and Assistance as it considers appropriate. of police station work, to fund such Advice and Assistance as it considers appropriate.
 +
 2. Police Station Advice and Assistance can be given either by a duty solicitor or the client’s own 2. Police Station Advice and Assistance can be given either by a duty solicitor or the client’s own
 solicitor. Criminal Legal Aid can only pay for advice if that Provider holds a Contract. Subject to local solicitor. Criminal Legal Aid can only pay for advice if that Provider holds a Contract. Subject to local
criminal_bills_assessment_manual.txt · Last modified: 2018/07/25 21:00 by frescom